First of all a disclaimer. This is not meant to take sides in the discussion of the use
of drones in warfare, but a look at the other side of the issue, a side that
has not been articulated in anything
I've read.
Putting the blind fear survivalists have of the their own
government spying on them or coming after them, the issue seems to be the cold,
impartial way an inanimate object kills innocents. Well, conventional war kills innocents too. It doesn't make
it right, but that's part of the deal.
Civilians die in wars, always have, always will, that is the nature of
war.
It is also the nature of war that young people in uniform
die fighting for causes a lot of them don't even understand. Look at Iraq. Bush
and Cheney rushed us into war against a country based on lies emanating from the 9/11 attacks and intelligence, or lack of it,
concerning weapons of mass destruction. It was all couched in patriotism, and
the troops were made heroes fighting to protect America. What exactly they were
protecting America from still remains a big question. Iraq was no threat to Americans, unless you count oil
supplies. But that's off the
subject. Plenty of civilians died in
the Iraq conflict; as a matter of fact they are still dying even though the
U.S. is not fighting there any more.
As a matter of fact it is a civilian against civilian war that kills
innocents by the hundreds. But let
a U.S. drone go astray and kill a noncombatant, immediately the whole thing is
vile.
While that is inexcusable, look at the other side of the
drone effort. Through history the
development of equipment for war has been aimed at killing as many of the enemy
as possible while slowly moving your own fighters farther and farther from
danger. Long range artillery does
that, beginning with catapults.
Airplanes do that, putting fighters farther removed from those they are
fighting, taking them out of
hazard while still exacting a toll on the enemy.
The drone carries that to a new extreme.
The fighting man or woman now can sit relatively safely in a room
somewhere, while targeting the
enemy. More casualties on the
enemy, fewer on the good guys. It keeps our guys safer and less vulnerable to
the wounds of war.
The horrors of the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki killed thousands of Japanese civilians, but World War II ended RIGHT
NOW without the loss of one more American serviceman's life. What is right? Distance from the immediate
battlefield? Maybe.
And, while we condemn those wicked drones for killing
bystanders, keep in mind that they also do a job that used to have to be done
by troops on the ground where they would have to face enemy fire. What began as hand to hand combat and
ever since the first cave man pounded the second caveman, armies have worked to
remove combatants step by step away from face-to-face confrontation. The drone is simply the most recent
step in that process and it does save lives on our side.
Of course, any weapon of war can be used for other applications
and therein lies the danger of drones.
If a government uses them to spy on its own citizens or attack its own
people or they get into the hands
of terrorists, it becomes a different story. For the time being given that we have to trust our own people
with every other weapon of war, we have to trust them to do the right thing
with drones as well, but not without what oversight we can manage. The enemy
here isn't the drones themselves, the enemy is war itself. If the energy put
into condemning or defending drones were put instead into creating peace we
would all be better off, and the world would be a better place. Given man's history there's not much
chance of that.
So if we do have to fight wars, isn't it preferable we fight
them employing a gamer with a joy stick to assure someone's son or
daughter, brother or sister, husband or wife comes home rather than dying in combat,
especially when our national motives are suspect and history may show those precious
men and women died for no good reason at all?
FAA approves use of drones over Alaska oil fields
Drones in Alaska.
FAA approves use of drones over Alaska oil fields
Drones in Alaska.
No comments:
Post a Comment