Sunlight hits Pioneer Peak out the front window at about 10:30 p.m. July 27. |
Pages
▼
Monday, July 28, 2014
Thursday, July 24, 2014
Oh, yeah there's a garden going on, too
Haven't posted much about the garden this year. Like every other year, it's full of surprises and new stuff and things I didn't expect. Here are just a few examples:
Lettuce and potatoes with a lillie in foreground. Already harvested some of those vegetables. |
Two pots of pansies and petunias. |
Potatoes pretty much took over one end of the garden. Not a good year for tomatoes which should be tall in the background. Skinny green things in front are onions. |
Here's that woodpecker on the tree. It's a hairy identified by size and the red spot on its head. |
We had a very hot May and I read birds needed water in that situation, so I invented a bird bath. This is the first one I have seen using it. Hairy woodpecker. |
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
Somewhere among those refugee kids is a writer
This guy wants to be president of the United States. One Facebook commenter
called this FULL METAL JACKASS.
|
Somewhere among those children making their way from Central
America north through Mexico and into the United States, there is a child who
someday will sit down and write the story of his or her journey to what is
hoped to be refuge from the violence and poverty of the homeland.
If the child survives the journey through hunger, Mexican
bandits, those coyotes who guide people across the border, crosses the Rio Grande
hoping to find an American Border Patrol officer to surrender to, and is
allowed to stay in the country, or even if sent back, and somehow lives to adulthood,
the description of the journey may be told. Then, too that 5-year-old will have
to survive the Texas governor, flying overhead in a military helicopter,
machine gun at the ready apparently to mow down these dangerous interlopers
seeking the American dream.
One of those kids will survive to tell the story and only
then may the United States show some sympathy for their plight, at least those
Americans who can read and choose to, because by then the way things are going
with education these days, even basic reading let alone access to truth may become problems in the near
future.
It is the history of such events that this country, supposedly founded on some principles involved with embracing refugees from all manner of
atrocious situations, attempts to stop new emigres at the border. I am here, now close the gate.
There are several memes floating around the Internet with photos of Native
Americans saying something like "oh you don't like immigrants? When are
you leaving?"
But that same internet seems to be overwhelmed with those who
spew hatred toward these innocent children and spreading fears of such things
as criminals among them or deadly diseases they will spread into our
population. Perhaps we should all be taking notes for that writer who probably
doesn't even know yet that it is his destiny.
Those notes
should include progressions like this: In the Texas budgeting process this year
Gov. Rick Perry cut funding for border protection. Then two days ago he sent 1,000 Texas National Guard soldiers
to protect it from these kids. But today, today, he found it necessary to
patrol that border himself in a helicopter, his itchy trigger finger ready on
what looks like a door-mounted 7.62 mm machine gun. Does anyone really believe he will use that if
the helicopter happens to encounter a group of kids crossing the Rio Grande in
an inflatable raft? That's doubtful considering the operators of the helo didn't allow him to have any ammunition. Put all that in the notebook for the aspiring novelist.
A week or so ago a U.S, Representative joined protesters
attempting to stop an anticipated bus bringing some of those kids to a town in
California. When a school bus approached he joined the others showing their
signs of hatred toward who they thought were children who probably could not
read them. The congressman even said he saw the fear on the children's faces as
they peered from the bus window at
the demonstration. When the truth came out, it was a busload of American kids
on the way to summer camp, and those fearful kids were actually laughing at the
demonstrators and taking pictures with their smartphones to post on Instagram.
It took about six tries for that congressman to back away from his original
statement. One more for that notebook.
Perhaps the most telling meme around says something like "if
your religion says an embryo is life to be protected, but living refugee children
are not, then you need to rethink your devotion." Put that in the notebook as well. But these are only asides, footnotes, perspective. Only someone experiencing the journey first hand is going to be able to tell the true story of what these kids are going through.
One can only hope in time the U.S. will find a way to
accommodate these kids, bring them into the fold, save them from the horrors in their homelands and in the process, liberate the mind of that youngster who survives the journey to write the
story. That has been the way of the world; the stories of what refugees endure
never surfaces until the child grows into an adult and with that perspective
tells it all too late to save many of those even now enduring the journey.
One can only hope that writer isn't killed by starvation, or Mexican criminals
or gunned down by the governor of Texas. Even with those obstacles, one of them is bound to make it and then we will maybe come to understand what we have done.
What remains to be seen is, when that child of today sits down as an adult of tomorrow to write the final chapter will it describe opportunity and success in the new country or will it chronicle another disappointing step along a tortuous trek toward eventual tragedy?
There is a book called "Enrique's Journey," written by a woman who made the trip.
What remains to be seen is, when that child of today sits down as an adult of tomorrow to write the final chapter will it describe opportunity and success in the new country or will it chronicle another disappointing step along a tortuous trek toward eventual tragedy?
There is a book called "Enrique's Journey," written by a woman who made the trip.
Monday, July 21, 2014
Ramblings in a mental wilderness
A commercial last night showed a broad expanse of snow-covered
tundra while the announcer said something like "observe this stretch of tundra
and imagine the future. We see a new drill pad with wells pumping ...." I physically shuddered at that thought
and turned it off.
Oddly juxtaposed in my mind was a story a friend of mine wrote about finding the skeleton of
a missing man in the Alaska wild 30 years ago. His story is added at the bottom here and it was attached as a
comment to a news site article that gave some of the history of people who have
ventured into the wilderness never to return. That story only guesses at the number who wandered into the wild without
telling anybody they were going.
As the article says it could be dozens and it could be hundreds. There's a link below to the article.
My mind was kind of racing around and I recalled a stretch
of tundra east of the village of Shaktoolik on the Bering Sea coast. It looked very much like the image in the commercial. One day
during an Iditarod race I was staring at that white expanse trying to find the
words to describe it. Barren tundra had been used to the point of cliché. An
elderly man from the village walked up to me and asked what I was doing and I
told him I was trying to find the words to describe what I was seeing. All I saw was empty white, but he told
me it was actually more swamp than tundra and he started pointing out where the
river runs full of salmon in the summer and the slight rises where the arctic
hares can be found in winter and another spot where edible birds gathered and about the caribou that occasionally showed up near the mountains on the eastern horizon. The
nuances of shadows here and there accented the white and that land slowly came
alive for me. He described a world full of life that I could not see, but he
drove the word barren out of mind and I thanked him for sharing his knowledge.
Today I wonder in the centuries his people lived there how
many of them wandered out into that wilderness and never came back. And then
think across Alaska, the Arctic Slope. the Brooks Range of mountains rising
from it to the south and the deep forests of the Interior stretching to the sea
even farther to the south and opening onto more tundra to the southwest. A large
portion of it is bordered by ocean along a coastline longer than the whole rest
of the United States put together. There are lots of places to get lost.
White men only started coming to Alaska in the 1700s but
archeology tells us the Natives lived here for at least 10.000 years before that. How
many of them did the wilderness swallow even though they would have been so much
more savvy about survival than those white men who came along later.
Trappers, gold miners, adventurers, how many wandered into
the wilderness leaving no trace with only tentative connections to relatives in
the Big Outside many of whom never learned what happened to Uncle Jack or a
father or a son or a daughter.
Today it's mostly adventurers who take those steps off the
roadways and disappear. But now
they carry cell phones and GPS emergency locaters and have access to rescue by
airplanes and helicopters and boats all over the state. Still now and then
someone slips away, like the fellow Joe May and Harry Sutherland found thirty
years ago, his bones mixed with those of two grizzlies, telling the story of a
horrendous battle that neither bear nor man won. It can still happen today. As
a matter of fact two adventurers are missing along the southern coast of Alaska
right now.
But that wilderness and the danger it holds won't always be
there if the visionaries like those who sponsored that advertisement have their
way. Drilling pads and strip mines
and roads and dams and all kinds
of possible developments have those people lusting after the land to take it over
and make it like everywhere else, paying only required lip service to
preservation and wilderness. And one day, maybe as soon as my grandson's time
people will ask where it went. At times I wonder even now.
Given a choice of a horizon dotted with drilling pads or
what at least looks like Arctic wasteland, I'll take the wasteland, the one
described by that elder in Shaktoolik that a person can enter and never return from, one that is bustling with life if only we
take the time to see it.
Here's how my friend Joe May described his discovery:
Trapping shelter used by several people over several decades.
Photo is 30-35 years old.
Photo courtesy -- Joe May
|
"Thirty
years ago, Harry Sutherland and I were prospecting a creek south of the Little
Peters Hills. Gathering firewood for our evening camp I came upon bones lightly
covered in moss. To kill time until bed time we dug the bones out and
reassembled them like Tinker Toys. We ended with two grizzlies and one human.
Later, in discussion with Cliff Hudson, the Talkeetna bush pilot, we surmised
that we had found Jack Sneider, a trapper who had failed to make a rendezvous
with Hudson near there years before. Jack obviously shot the bears but not
before they got him. Today, a nearby lake is named for the man. Schneider had no
close relatives so we left him where we found him. So...everyone who goes lost
up here doesn't always stay that way. I like to think Harry and I gave Sneider
a more proper send-off... twenty years after the fact, but better late than
never.
"Jack Schneider's
bones, those that haven't washed down the creek as a result of our disturbance,
lie within a few feet of of the south bank
of Bear Creek at the south toe of the Little Peters Hills.
"The photo is of
cabin he left from to make the rendezvous with Cliff. The cabin is on the north side of Bear Creek.
"The cabin was originally built by a party of
prospectors about 90 years ago. It was used as a line cabin by a former owner
of the Fairview Inn (a famous historic bar in Talkeetna) and a trapping partner
during the Depression in the 30's. Schneider refurbished and used it as a line
cabin in the 50's. George Sanderlin (in the Talkeetna cemetery now) and I put a
makeshift roof on it and used it as a trapping shelter in the 70's. Photo is
30/35 years old. I have Schneider’s frying pan around here somewhere … it still
smells like fish."
Missing in Alaska without a trace by Craig Medred in the Alaska Dispatch News
Lost in the woods, a blog post
Lost in the woods, a blog post
Friday, July 18, 2014
The Great Margaritaville cruise finds One Particular Harbor
Valdez, Alaska, seldom has a hot summer day. Built tight against the Chugach Mountains, surrounded by glaciers, and fronting on the cold North Pacific ocean, it just isn't in a place that encourages heat. But there was a day in 1987 when the temperature rose so high our favorite harbor bartender told us to take a table out into the parking lot to enjoy the late afternoon sea breeze. She promised someone would wait on us and someone did.
So, a bunch of us gathered around that table joined by others now and then and losing a participant occasionally, but a core of about eight of us remained for the duration. Conversation covered the gamut of fishing, boats and weather and sea stories until someone brought up the fact that Jimmy Buffett was playing a concert in Anchorage in the next couple of weeks and we were stuck so far away. There's a line in a Stan Rogers song about the same sort of gathering in which he sings "… with every jar that hit the bar …" a plan grew. It was that way on that hot night in a Valdez bar's parking lot.
With every jar that hit the bar we went from lamenting the fact that we would miss the concert to we could charter the tour boat I drove, get hold of concert tickets, arrange a bus ride from the harbor on the other side of Prince William Sound to the city and then sell tickets to the concert. People were responsible for their own meals and hotel.
First thing the next morning I approached the owner of the company. It being late August the tourist business had begun its late season decline and he allowed the charter. I contacted my daughter's mother in Anchorage and she purchased about $1,200 worth of concert tickets. A friend in another tour outfit scheduled one of the company's buses to take us to and from the harbor in Whittier and then to Anchorage and back and the marketing began. A few posters and a posting on the local cable channel scanner did the trick. We sold out within four days.
In a town with no movie theaters and a name performer coming by once every couple of years, people thirst for entertainment opportunities. Our plan was to leave early in the morning, reach Whittier in early afternoon and take the bus to Anchorage in plenty of time to make the concert. The next day we would meet in a central location, take the bus back to Whittier and the boat back to Valdez.
What could go wrong? For once, nothing at all. We had perfect weather crossing the sound, flat glassy water, blue skies and a party going on in the boat. The owner had installed a generator the year before and in his wildest dreams I don't think he ever expected to hear it used to keep four blenders producing margaritas all day long. With lots of music over the stereo and a calm ride, the 120-mile, six-hour trip passed happily and uneventfully.
In Whittier we secured the boat, met the bus and headed for Anchorage. And finally I could have one of those margaritas.
A few hours later we gathered in our block of seats and enjoyed the concert. Most of us had sailed for years with Jimmy Buffett singing the sound track, so we knew the songs and finally enjoyed a live performance.
Afterward we separated again and went our personal ways, eventually to hotel rooms or friends' couches.
The next day at noon everyone showed up to meet the bus, we didn't lose a soul, and off we went to the boat for the voyage home.
The weather hadn't changed and we enjoyed another clear, flat, glassy day. Feeling so good, I took the boat to places we didn't usually go on our trips and gave the folks a real treat in seeing Prince William Sound. One fellow who had been around for many years said we had showed him places he had never even heard of. The waterfall in Cascade Bay was one of those.
Night fell while we were still under way and we cruised toward the harbor in the dark on a party boat with lights blazing. Maragaritas still flowed, now it was all Buffett on the stereo and people were even dancing. We entered the harbor and I found the song I wanted. "One Particular Harbor" and played it loud enough to be heard on shore.
Right in front of the windows that overlooked the harbor from that bar I did a couple of brodies in the harbor's turning basin while the song blasted and passengers danced on the weather deck, waving to people in the bar who by then had spotted us.
When the song ended I pulled up to the dock where tour boats discharged passengers and let the partiers off, then went to our own slip with the crew. Once we had the boat secured, we all went up to the bar where the party was still in progress and lasted well into the night. At one point the owner of another bar in town, who had been on the trip, said it had been so good, if I wanted to do another one some time he would front the money. But that was for another day. The euphoria of the experience still had a grip and the party kept going until the last jar hit the bar.
The next morning I woke up and walked into the main cabin. I felt something out of place and it occurred to me that you know you had a good party when you walk in the next day and your floor is still sticky from spilled margaritas. It took a while to clean that boat but it was worth it. Over all, I lost about $90 for the effort and that was worth it too.
Now almost 30 years later I run into people who were on that cruise and they still talk about it. A defining moment? Maybe. Just plain fun? Absolutely.
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
Conspiracy check-- this time it's life insurance
I'm not one of those people who sees conspiracy behind
everything that happens in the world. As a matter of fact, over the course of
my life I have taken things at face value without questioning more often
probably than I should have.
So, when I get the hint of some kind of ripoff, my first
question is to myself, "Are you nuts?" Most often the answer is yes,
but with some even when the answer is yes, there is a lingering doubt.
One of those popped up today. I have been maintaining a
small life insurance policy, enough to mostly cover funeral costs and leftover
bills so my kids won't have to deal with that sort of thing. The premium has
been small enough that I barely notice.
But, a couple of weeks ago I received notice that my premium
would double next month. Double! Same coverage, same payout, double the cost. My
first reaction, and probably my course of action, was to cash out the policy. I
did think it was kind of an outrage to hit someone on a fixed retirement income
with a 100 percent cost increase.
Today I talked with the insurer and said something about not
needing my premiums to double against my fixed income at my age. She giggled a
little and said something like, "I can understand that." So the
paperwork is under way to cash out the policy and leave me without life
insurance. I do have other funds that will cover the same expenses and the cash
out amount is almost the same as the payout in case of my death. After I started that process, it struck me that maybe that's what the insurance company wants.
I started thinking about that -- in case of my death. In case of? I'm pretty sure that's a given. But, now, here's the rub.
The insurance company knows that's a given, too. They know when I die they will
have to make the payout.
Remember the old joke about life insurance being a gamble in
which you are betting you will die and the insurer is betting you will live?
Something like that. Well suddenly I see a bunch of guys, their suit jackets
off, suspenders over wrinkled white shirts, sleeves rolled up and one of them
says: "You know everybody's going to die, so every policy we sell is going
to pay off at some point. That's a big drain. Maybe we can find a way to keep the money."
So, one guy says, "How about we do this. With people
holding policies for a long time, once they retire and start counting pennies,
we double the premium. They'll
decide they can't handle the added cost and cancel the policy. We get their money for 40 years and
then when they get close to the payoff we make it so many of them will want to
cancel the policy. No payout. More profit. Bigger bottom line."
And now I feel like I have been walking down the path into
their trap for almost 40 years. I don't even want to know how much I paid over
the years, but I do know this, while I will get money for growth and interest,
I will be getting a portion of my own money back, not a cent from the insurance
company itself. So, they have been profiting from me for four decades, but when
it gets close to the payoff for my heirs, they find a way out of the deal. Pretty
slick.
On purpose, do you think? The way they go after numbers, it's
doubtful it happens by coincidence. As a wise man once said, there are no
coincidences. I wonder if there is a way to find out how many insurance
companies do this and how many people they do it to. If they do, I would expect the amount
of money they save goes into the millions, if not billions of dollars.
I am beginning to think that little giggle from my agent
after commenting on doubling premiums on a fixed income was more of a snicker
--- we got another one. She'll probably get a bonus.
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Let's not leave Exxon Valdez out of the corporate Supreme Court mess
The way it was explained in high school history class, the
reason the authors of American democracy gave Supreme Court justices lifetime
terms was to encourage objectivity on the court. Appointees for life no longer
had to follow affiliations they may have made to get to the bench as they had a
lucrative job for the rest of their lives with no political repercussions.
Then came the issue of activist judges. Remember those accusations when
President Obama began making his appointments to various federal courts? The
concern should have been about those judges already appointed by Republicans to
the Supreme Court.
Now we have a court that is slowly dismantling the democracy
in favor of corporations and the rich. This is not what James Madison and the
other authors of the Constitution had in mind.
The court's Citizens United decision ruled corporations were
people as far as political contributions are concerned with no accounting and
no identification. More recently the Hobby Lobby decision not only gave more power
to corporations but also violated the separation of church and state doctrine
by allowing companies to refuse certain health insurance coverages based on
religious beliefs.
But long before that, in 2008, the corporate court ruled in
favor of Exxon, cutting punitive damages for spilling oil all over Alaska's
Prince William Sound from $2.4 billion to $500 million, less than one fourth of
the original settlement. That should have been a signal of what was to come.
Slap down the individual citizen, as in Alaska fishing families, in favor of
the largest corporation in the world. It was the answer she should have given
when Katy Couric asked Sarah Palin, then governor of Alaska, if there was a
Supreme Court decision she disagreed with.
In the future as resistance grows to this attempted corporate takeover of the American judicial system and as follows, the government, let's include Exxon Valdez in the argument right along with Hobby Lobby and Citizens United as evidence. It's only fair, except fair, let alone justice, doesn't seem to count with this court.
In the future as resistance grows to this attempted corporate takeover of the American judicial system and as follows, the government, let's include Exxon Valdez in the argument right along with Hobby Lobby and Citizens United as evidence. It's only fair, except fair, let alone justice, doesn't seem to count with this court.
Once again, much ado about nothing
The talking heads this morning are all over the issue of
President Obama going to Texas but not going to the border with Mexico where a
steady flow of Central American
children has been passing into the United States.
There's very little reporting about the problem itself and
potential ways to deal with the children if not solve the basic issue. What
difference does it make when so many federal and state agencies are doing what they can
to address it, if the president shows up on the border anyway? Does that do one
single thing to solve the problem?
The Barbie newscasters are gathering panel after panel of
supposed experts (many are the same old jerks they haul out to discuss every
other situation that comes up) to beat the subject to death, a subject that has
no bearing on anything at all except television ratings that apparently rise
when they criticize the president.
You know damn well, the minute he stepped out of that
helicopter next to the Rio Grande River, the people criticizing him for not
going would be shouting that he's using a serious situation to create a photo opportunity -- grandstanding for his own political gain.
Sometimes you have to admire how strong the president really is, just to get up in the morning and face this crap day after day after day.
Sometimes you have to admire how strong the president really is, just to get up in the morning and face this crap day after day after day.
Sunday, July 6, 2014
Never underestimate the value of a nap in the problem-solving process
I bought this four-wheeler in 1995. That makes it about 19
years old. After I had paid for it
and loaded it into my truck, I walked into the dealer's shop area and asked for
the manager. When he came over I told him I had just bought the four-wheeler,
it was paid for and now I wanted an honest answer. What can go wrong with this
machine, what breaks, what spare parts do you think I should carry?
He looked at me and said, "Nothing, they always come
back. Get a tire repair kit and you’re good." So far he's been right, I haven't even needed the tire-repair kit, but that run almost ended yesterday at least in my own mind.
Let me explain a little of the mechanics involved first. You
can't start this four-wheeler if it is in gear. I imagine that's a safety
feature on most of them. There are three indicator lights: one
red if the engine oil is overheated, another red one tells you you are in
reverse gear and one lights green if the machine is in neutral. That green light has to be on or the engine won't start. There is no other indicator to let you know what gear you are using. To shift gears there is
a kick shifter, one down for reverse after you hold in a mechanical button and
four up for forward gears. Occasionally if I leave it in reverse when I turn it
off, it will be difficult to shift out of that gear to start it.
With that said, over the July 4 weekend at the East Pole, I pulled a heavy load of firewood up the
hill to the cabin, some of what I left at the bottom in March. Next to the cabin I had to stop on a steep bit of trail, I was backing
up, but had to stop and I locked in the parking brake and shut the machine off.
Then I unloaded the firewood, unhitched the trailer and moved it out of the way
and went to start the four-wheeler to set up for the next run down the hill.
No green light. I kept kicking the shifter upward and still
no green light, I figured it might somehow be jammed tight against something
and I tried to relieve that pressure by pushing it forward a little. Wouldn't
budge; I’d try to kick the shifter up out of reverse but still no green light.
The red reverse light wasn't on either but I couldn't remember if that came on
when the engine wasn't running.
To keep this post at a reasonable length I'll tell you I wrestled
with that machine for more than an hour, even involving the come-along using it
to pull the machine into different positions on the hill to try to relieve that
tension so I could start it. When I finally gave up it was 50 feet down the
hill from the cabin and still silent. By that time I had been thinking of
possibilities. In addition to a number of mechanical experiments I could have
tried, I also started thinking about leaving it there and walking out to the
trailhead, about seven miles of hilly, muddy trail and me not exactly in the
best shape of my life. I wasn't going to do it in 2 hours and 20 minutes. I
also realized I hadn't eaten in a while and maybe wasn't thinking clearly.
So, I left it and hiked up the cabin and made myself a hamburger. Of course, what follows a
filling lunch? A nap, of course. This is the Bush after all. I laid down for a
while, hoping to sleep and maybe wake up with a solution. But there wasn't going
to be any sleep; my mind just kept churning. On one side I was figuring out
the logistics of hiking out, what I was going to have to leave there, how I
could get the four-wheeler under the porch to protect it. The other half was
thinking through the difficulty with the four-wheeler looking for an answer.
After maybe 20 minutes of no sleep and a lot of thought, I
started thinking through reasons why that machine would not shift out of
reverse. As I thought about it, all the shifting I had tried was up, up toward
the forward gears. At times it felt like it had shifted but the green light did
not come on and the machine wouldn't start. As I thought further, I realized when I had moved it downhill it had gone fairly easily, but kind of chugged with that
sound an engine makes when the spark plugs aren't firing. Why would it go
forward if it was in reverse? It occurred to me I had been so convinced the transmission was stuck in reverse, the idea it might be in another gear never even came to mind.
It slowly dawned on me that I might have been shifting it
into forward gears and that's why it refused to start. My last thought before
attempting to fall asleep was I should try downshifting one gear at a time and
see if at one point the green light shined on.
Of course. with the simplest of all solutions burning in my
brain I wasn't about to fall asleep any time soon. Eventually, giving up, I put on my clothes and boots and headed downhill. I kept thinking it can't be this
simple. Still halfway planning my walk out, I sat in the seat and carefully kicked the shifter down one.
It felt like it had shifted gears, but no green light. I kicked it a second
time and again it felt like it shifted but no green. I kicked it again, turned
the key and, voila! A green light.
I hit the starter button and the engine fired right up. The darned thing had been in third
gear, not reverse. I raised my arms and gave a victory shout to the fans watching from the
woods. That was when the wave of stupid washed over me.
In a previous post, I mentioned one of the benefits of
living alone in the Bush is when you make stupid mistakes no one has to know
about it unless you want them to. This was one of those, but all in all it's
pretty funny too, so, I can take the ribbing. I'm just glad I didn't have to
test myself on that trail. Of course, there is some satisfaction in keeping the 19-year performance record intact, despite the spates of pilot error.
Incidentally while I was out there, we had enjoyed three
beautiful hot days. By hot, I mean you couldn't even hold onto the door knob for any
length of time. The next day, I
drove out, loaded everything on the trailer and headed for home. A couple of
miles on the highway and I stopped for a snack. When I emerged from the store,
I felt the first drops of rain. I drove the rest of the way home in a downpour.
If I had hiked, I figured I would have been about halfway along the trail to the trailhead when
the rain started. I'll take it.
Plus now there is at least a winter's worth of firewood under the cabin. Only
four more years to go.
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Fred Meyer continues baiting the elderly
Once again Fred Meyer demonstrates how honest the company is being with elderly shoppers. A couple of months ago I was checking out on the first Tuesday of the month. At the time I had not made the connection, but the checker told me I qualified for the discount the stores offer older shoppers on the first Tuesday of each month. Then with her voice lowered to almost a whisper she told me very conspiratorially checkers had been told not to offer the discount and only give it when someone specifically asks for it. We shared winks and I thanked her.
Fast forward a couple of months and I made another trip on a first Tuesday. Unlike a couple of other trips, this time I remembered to ask the checker for the senior discount. I watched the display on the register and I think she saw the consternation on my face because she informed me the discount was only for house brands. So, I had made a trip to Fred Meyer on a first Tuesday to save myself a little money. Care to guess how much? My total came to a little over $100. When I got home and checked the receipt, it informed me I had saved a whole 35 cents. Incidentally it did not appear to apply to a $30 item that was a house brand. Thanks again Freddy.
On another note, a few years ago the company began offering reusable bags for sale. Part of the advertised deal was you got five cents off per bag each shopping trip if you used them. They don't do that anymore. Now, my interest in using the reusable bags is not the nickel, it's about all those plastic bags dumped into the environment. However I thought that nickel was a nice incentive for others to join the effort. Those nickels must have hit the bottom line too heavily, so they went the way of a serious senior discount.
There is no need to be devious. If Fred Meyer wants the business be up front about the discounts, say it out loud and straightforwardly. "Fred Meyer offers discounts to senior citizens on most house brands the first Tuesday of every month." Do that instead of hiding the qualifiers in minute type on an obscure web site. The honesty would pay off. The way it's done now, it sure makes it look like the company wants to hide the true discount just to lure people into the store. Not much different from a car dealer who offers a markdown on cars and when you go you find out it was for one specific car that has since been sold.
Original post about Fred Meyer/Kroger baiting senior citizens
Fast forward a couple of months and I made another trip on a first Tuesday. Unlike a couple of other trips, this time I remembered to ask the checker for the senior discount. I watched the display on the register and I think she saw the consternation on my face because she informed me the discount was only for house brands. So, I had made a trip to Fred Meyer on a first Tuesday to save myself a little money. Care to guess how much? My total came to a little over $100. When I got home and checked the receipt, it informed me I had saved a whole 35 cents. Incidentally it did not appear to apply to a $30 item that was a house brand. Thanks again Freddy.
On another note, a few years ago the company began offering reusable bags for sale. Part of the advertised deal was you got five cents off per bag each shopping trip if you used them. They don't do that anymore. Now, my interest in using the reusable bags is not the nickel, it's about all those plastic bags dumped into the environment. However I thought that nickel was a nice incentive for others to join the effort. Those nickels must have hit the bottom line too heavily, so they went the way of a serious senior discount.
There is no need to be devious. If Fred Meyer wants the business be up front about the discounts, say it out loud and straightforwardly. "Fred Meyer offers discounts to senior citizens on most house brands the first Tuesday of every month." Do that instead of hiding the qualifiers in minute type on an obscure web site. The honesty would pay off. The way it's done now, it sure makes it look like the company wants to hide the true discount just to lure people into the store. Not much different from a car dealer who offers a markdown on cars and when you go you find out it was for one specific car that has since been sold.
Original post about Fred Meyer/Kroger baiting senior citizens